TPLWU Local 4948
We Make Libraries Work.
February 03, 2012
We are Migrating . . . !
Thanks to all our loyal readers who have followed our library workers blog over the years.
Please continue to visit us at our new website.
(for best results, use Firefox, Chrome or upgrade to IE 9)
For Local 4948 members, please register for access to the members' site.
Go to the new website.
Click on the "Member Login" on the top right hand corner and follow the instructions to register.
January 27, 2012
Press Conference at the Sheraton Today
As you may all have heard in the media, Local 4948 held a press conference this morning. Below is the press release that went out this morning.
***************************************************
The heads of two unions representing City of Toronto workers - Mark Ferguson, President of CUPE local 416 Toronto Civic Employees Union, and Maureen O'Reilly, President of CUPE local 4948 Toronto Public Library Workers Union - gave an update today on the state of bargaining.
O'Reilly announced that their bargaining team has requested conciliation; Ferguson aired his growing concern, amidst "one-sided" bargaining, that service providers will be locked out by the City.
"Bargaining usually involves two parties coming to the table with changes they want, and then negotiating something both can live with," said Ferguson. "I have been at tables through the Lastman and Miller eras - they all worked that way. This is completely different - totally one-sided."
Ferguson pointed out that his bargaining team has not sought any significant improvements to the agreement, and has in fact offered many efficiencies on their own initiative - including a way to make redeployment process smoother, and, notably, a three-year wage freeze that would save Toronto over $25 million to put towards community programs.
"But rather than acknowledge these offers - ones that would address their own concerns - the City has focused on over 60 desired changes. Demands, really, since they are unwilling to consider any counter-offers.
"We are concerned, just over a week from the point when the City can lock service providers out or tear-up their contract, that there is still no negotiating at the negotiating table."
Ms. O'Reilly joined Mr. Ferguson to air similar concerns, which have led her bargaining team to request a conciliator from the Ministry of Labour, in order to keep negotiations on track.
"Library management has made it clear that they will just demand from us whatever they can win from 416," said O'Reilly. "It worries us that they aren't really negotiating with us, and that negotiations with our fellow public servants show no sign of commitment on the City's part to maintaining service."
O'Reilly also voiced concern about increased reliance on precarious, part-time work at the City in general, and Toronto Public Library specifically. "Libraries lost 107 positions to the budget, which means loss of service," she said. "Half our members are already part-time. Even as library use grows, we're working with fewer and fewer staff, who make less and less money to do more and more work.
"Libraries work because of librarians. If the City targets basic protections for staff, they are targeting basic services. And if they lock out public servants, they are locking out the people who use public services. We are asking for a real sign from the City that they want to keep public services open."
***************************************************
The heads of two unions representing City of Toronto workers - Mark Ferguson, President of CUPE local 416 Toronto Civic Employees Union, and Maureen O'Reilly, President of CUPE local 4948 Toronto Public Library Workers Union - gave an update today on the state of bargaining.
O'Reilly announced that their bargaining team has requested conciliation; Ferguson aired his growing concern, amidst "one-sided" bargaining, that service providers will be locked out by the City.
"Bargaining usually involves two parties coming to the table with changes they want, and then negotiating something both can live with," said Ferguson. "I have been at tables through the Lastman and Miller eras - they all worked that way. This is completely different - totally one-sided."
Ferguson pointed out that his bargaining team has not sought any significant improvements to the agreement, and has in fact offered many efficiencies on their own initiative - including a way to make redeployment process smoother, and, notably, a three-year wage freeze that would save Toronto over $25 million to put towards community programs.
"But rather than acknowledge these offers - ones that would address their own concerns - the City has focused on over 60 desired changes. Demands, really, since they are unwilling to consider any counter-offers.
"We are concerned, just over a week from the point when the City can lock service providers out or tear-up their contract, that there is still no negotiating at the negotiating table."
Ms. O'Reilly joined Mr. Ferguson to air similar concerns, which have led her bargaining team to request a conciliator from the Ministry of Labour, in order to keep negotiations on track.
"Library management has made it clear that they will just demand from us whatever they can win from 416," said O'Reilly. "It worries us that they aren't really negotiating with us, and that negotiations with our fellow public servants show no sign of commitment on the City's part to maintaining service."
O'Reilly also voiced concern about increased reliance on precarious, part-time work at the City in general, and Toronto Public Library specifically. "Libraries lost 107 positions to the budget, which means loss of service," she said. "Half our members are already part-time. Even as library use grows, we're working with fewer and fewer staff, who make less and less money to do more and more work.
"Libraries work because of librarians. If the City targets basic protections for staff, they are targeting basic services. And if they lock out public servants, they are locking out the people who use public services. We are asking for a real sign from the City that they want to keep public services open."
January 24, 2012
Call it a “Crisis” and it Allows Bad Things to Happen
The mayor and his followers on council believe they have successfully convinced the public that there is a financial crisis in the city, despite the revelation that Toronto is actually running a surplus position of $154 million and growing.
They have used this crisis to drive a series of serious cuts to services, including a cut of 5.9% to the Toronto Public Library, and laid the foundation for a concerted attack on the rights of unionized employees.
Bargaining with Local 79 and 416 had barely begun when the city began bashing union leadership through the media. Then it called for conciliation in order to speed the bargaining clock toward a climax.
What happens next? A serious attempt to steamroll major changes to all our collective agreements to make them more “flexible,” according to the City Manager.
This kind of bargaining is a radical departure from past practice where both sides studiously negotiate over a number of months, eventually arriving at a Collective Agreement.
Lessons from the OPSEU community college experience
Employers are practicing a new brand of ruthless and aggressive contract negotiations across Ontario. The City of Toronto is being advised by the law firm of Hicks Morley, notorious for crafty and radical bargaining strategies for employers.
It’s the law firm that advised the management of Ontario’s community colleges in 2009-10, when 8,000 faculty, represented by OPSEU, ended up with a collective agreement that rolled back their decades-old workload formula.
The sequence of events is instructive: After the two sides had bargained for a relatively short period of time, management called for a provincial conciliator. Soon after, management asked the Ontario Minister of Labour to issue a “no board” report, a labour law process that starts the 17-day countdown that leads to an “open period” when either side may legally call a lockout or a strike.
Once this open period was reached, on Nov. 14, 2009, management unilaterally imposed some of the terms and conditions contained in the employer’s proposals, including a modest wage increase.
However, management did not immediately impose the most contentious of its proposals -- a major change to the workload formula, which the union had won over a number of contracts dating back to 1984.
The two sides continued through the end of 2009 without a strike or a lockout, with faculty members working under the imposed new terms and conditions.
In the new semester beginning in January, 2010, college management took its next steps: The 20 community colleges suddenly hired thousands of temporary part-time instructors who also became members of the bargaining unit.
On Jan. 31, 2010, management imposed its “modified workload arrangements,” erasing the progressive changes to working conditions that were negotiated through joint union-management task force.
The union organized a province-wide strike vote, set for Feb. 17, 2010. But the strike vote was pre-empted when management requested the Ontario Labour Relations Board to order a supervised vote on its so-called “final” offer of unilateral changes. Under Ontario law, an employer has the one-time right to compel union members to vote on its offer.
In some colleges, managers held meetings with the new part-time instructors telling them to accept the management offer. On Feb.10, 2010, community college faculty ratified the management offer by a very close margin of 51 per cent of the members in favour.
College faculty are now working under an inferior contract with an increased workload, and most of the part-timers have been let go.
What’s next for Local 4948?
The employer served notice to bargain on December 12th and requested that Local 4948 provide its availability for bargaining in January. The union and management have now agreed to 11 bargaining dates with 9 bargaining dates in January. The first bargaining date is January 10th. We will, as always, keep you informed as bargaining progresses.
Your bargaining committee has prepared a set of modest proposals, based on the input you provided through the bargaining surveys.
Though our collective agreement technically “expired” on Dec. 31, all of its terms and conditions of employment continue to apply. The collective agreements will remain in force until we sign a new collective agreement, or 17 days after the Ontario Minister of Labour issues a “no board” report. The dispute then enters an “open period” when:
Your terms of employment can be legally changed by the employer, or
The TPL could lock us out of our workplace, or
The TPL could call for a vote on its “last” offer, or
Local 4948 could call a strike vote and then a strike or
Both sides could continue bargaining to a settlement.
Our goal is to reach a negotiated settlement.
Preparations are underway for a potential lockout. A strike committee is in place and a lockout/strike plan has been developed. In the event of a lockout/strike, all members will be asked to picket to be eligible for strike pay and benefits. Picket duty sign up forms have been sent out to all workplaces and all members are asked to complete the forms and return by fax to the Union office.
For more information about strike pay and benefits, please view the FAQ on the blog.
The next General Membership Meeting will be held on February 9 at 6:30pm at Northern District.
In Solidarity,
Maureen O’Reilly
President
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Bargaining Committee:
Brendan Haley, Viveca Gretton, Carmela DeGiorgio, Mary Bissell, Samee-Lee Grossman,
Brian Raymer and Karen Smith
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Executive Mobilization Team:
Steven Burdick, Nahid Rahnavard, Philip Singer and Fitzgerald Steele
Download a pdf version here.
They have used this crisis to drive a series of serious cuts to services, including a cut of 5.9% to the Toronto Public Library, and laid the foundation for a concerted attack on the rights of unionized employees.
Bargaining with Local 79 and 416 had barely begun when the city began bashing union leadership through the media. Then it called for conciliation in order to speed the bargaining clock toward a climax.
What happens next? A serious attempt to steamroll major changes to all our collective agreements to make them more “flexible,” according to the City Manager.
This kind of bargaining is a radical departure from past practice where both sides studiously negotiate over a number of months, eventually arriving at a Collective Agreement.
Lessons from the OPSEU community college experience
Employers are practicing a new brand of ruthless and aggressive contract negotiations across Ontario. The City of Toronto is being advised by the law firm of Hicks Morley, notorious for crafty and radical bargaining strategies for employers.
It’s the law firm that advised the management of Ontario’s community colleges in 2009-10, when 8,000 faculty, represented by OPSEU, ended up with a collective agreement that rolled back their decades-old workload formula.
The sequence of events is instructive: After the two sides had bargained for a relatively short period of time, management called for a provincial conciliator. Soon after, management asked the Ontario Minister of Labour to issue a “no board” report, a labour law process that starts the 17-day countdown that leads to an “open period” when either side may legally call a lockout or a strike.
Once this open period was reached, on Nov. 14, 2009, management unilaterally imposed some of the terms and conditions contained in the employer’s proposals, including a modest wage increase.
However, management did not immediately impose the most contentious of its proposals -- a major change to the workload formula, which the union had won over a number of contracts dating back to 1984.
The two sides continued through the end of 2009 without a strike or a lockout, with faculty members working under the imposed new terms and conditions.
In the new semester beginning in January, 2010, college management took its next steps: The 20 community colleges suddenly hired thousands of temporary part-time instructors who also became members of the bargaining unit.
On Jan. 31, 2010, management imposed its “modified workload arrangements,” erasing the progressive changes to working conditions that were negotiated through joint union-management task force.
The union organized a province-wide strike vote, set for Feb. 17, 2010. But the strike vote was pre-empted when management requested the Ontario Labour Relations Board to order a supervised vote on its so-called “final” offer of unilateral changes. Under Ontario law, an employer has the one-time right to compel union members to vote on its offer.
In some colleges, managers held meetings with the new part-time instructors telling them to accept the management offer. On Feb.10, 2010, community college faculty ratified the management offer by a very close margin of 51 per cent of the members in favour.
College faculty are now working under an inferior contract with an increased workload, and most of the part-timers have been let go.
What’s next for Local 4948?
The employer served notice to bargain on December 12th and requested that Local 4948 provide its availability for bargaining in January. The union and management have now agreed to 11 bargaining dates with 9 bargaining dates in January. The first bargaining date is January 10th. We will, as always, keep you informed as bargaining progresses.
Your bargaining committee has prepared a set of modest proposals, based on the input you provided through the bargaining surveys.
Though our collective agreement technically “expired” on Dec. 31, all of its terms and conditions of employment continue to apply. The collective agreements will remain in force until we sign a new collective agreement, or 17 days after the Ontario Minister of Labour issues a “no board” report. The dispute then enters an “open period” when:
Your terms of employment can be legally changed by the employer, or
The TPL could lock us out of our workplace, or
The TPL could call for a vote on its “last” offer, or
Local 4948 could call a strike vote and then a strike or
Both sides could continue bargaining to a settlement.
Our goal is to reach a negotiated settlement.
Lockout/strike preparations:
Preparations are underway for a potential lockout. A strike committee is in place and a lockout/strike plan has been developed. In the event of a lockout/strike, all members will be asked to picket to be eligible for strike pay and benefits. Picket duty sign up forms have been sent out to all workplaces and all members are asked to complete the forms and return by fax to the Union office.
For more information about strike pay and benefits, please view the FAQ on the blog.
The next General Membership Meeting will be held on February 9 at 6:30pm at Northern District.
In Solidarity,
Maureen O’Reilly
President
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Bargaining Committee:
Brendan Haley, Viveca Gretton, Carmela DeGiorgio, Mary Bissell, Samee-Lee Grossman,
Brian Raymer and Karen Smith
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Executive Mobilization Team:
Steven Burdick, Nahid Rahnavard, Philip Singer and Fitzgerald Steele
Download a pdf version here.
City Council calls the Tune for TPL Management
Local 4948 exchanged proposals with management on Jan. 10. We have 10 other dates confirmed for our bargaining: Jan. 19, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 30, 31, Feb 1 and 3.
When we met to exchange proposals, the Chief Negotiator for library management, Dan Keon, indicated very clearly that the Library Board wishes to be aligned with the City on all non-monetary and monetary issues. Three members of Mayor Ford’s Executive Committee sit on the Library Board, including Councillors Ainslie, Palacio, and Robinson. There are others on the Library Board, including Mike Foderick and Stephen Dulmage, who have indicated their support for a cost-cutting agenda for the Toronto Public Library that targets cuts to staff first and foremost.
The Mayor has given a mandate to the City’s negotiating committee to get concessions on wages, benefits and working conditions from CUPE Locals 416 and 79. On Jan.12 the City requested a “no-board” on Local 416, which will trigger a countdown to a possible lockout and disruption of services as early as February -- or the City could impose new terms and conditions of employment on 416 members.
On Jan. 10, library management indicated that the library board would be seeking the same concessions as the City on jobs, sick time, leaves, extended health and dental benefits and more as well as library specific concessions on hours of work, leaves, paid holidays, compensation and more. Management wants more discussions about how to achieve “efficiencies and improvements in library operations”. We know that “efficiencies” is code for more cuts to staff and loss of job opportunities.
Sweeping concessions would affect everyone
There is no hiding from the dire consequences of the amendments to your Collective Agreement tabled by management. Here are just some of the concessions they propose, and some of the stark implications for members:
Below is a list of some of the concessions that were tabled by the employer:
1. Jobs: Management wants to discuss all job security language in the collective agreement, in order to achieve greater “flexibility”. This means that management will be coming after our job security language and the provision that prohibits contracting out services if it will result in layoffs or loss of earnings. To date, the TPL Board has voted to cut 5.9 per cent, which represents a cut of 107 FTEs (full-time equivalents). If the City Budget Committee gets its way next week, the Board will be cutting 10 per cent and 161 FTEs. This on top of 198 FTEs cut since amalgamation!
Management also wants to discuss the increased use of volunteers. The Union supports the engagement of volunteers to complement the work of our members but not to replace our members work or reduce the number of jobs in our communities.
2. Cuts to benefits. Management wants to discuss “cost-savings” in extended health and dental benefits. The City proposes to cut benefits by 10 per cent.
3. Cuts to compensation including: Overtime, call-back pay, standby, Sunday work, evening & Saturday premiums. Here again, management wants to achieve “cost savings”. Management wants the ability to compel members to work on Sundays. Currently Sundays are voluntary.
4. Hours of work. Management is attacking Article 19 “Hours of Work” and looking to roll back all of the improvements that we have negotiated since amalgamation, including the elimination of variable work hours, the 63/7 option and TRL flex time.
At the same time, management wants to restrict page schedules and the right of pages to reschedule hours due to illness.
5. Management has tabled concessions on the collective agreement rights that provide time for our members to deal with family issues. 75 per cent of Local 4948 members are women. Many of our members struggle to maintain work/life balance. These provisions of our collective agreement assist our members with managing work schedules and responding to family concerns
We have set more dates for bargaining, but given these demands for concessions and what the City has done to Local 416 at the table, we are not optimistic that the TPL will bargain seriously. We next meet with the employer on Jan. 19.
Act now to safeguard your future
Your Local 4948 Strike Committee and Membership Mobilization teams are working hard to get information to the membership. The committee will be visiting the branches to answer questions and to share information.
Picket captains are being trained. If you haven’t signed up to be a picket captain and are willing, please let the strike committee know asap.
Every member should complete the picket duty sign-up form to register for picket duty. You can fax the form to the strike committee’s attention at 416-440-7984. If you need copies of the form, please contact your steward or the strike committee.
If you have questions about strike pay and benefits, please view the FAQ on the blog at http://www.libraryworkersunion.blogspot.com/.
If you have further questions, please contact the Strike Committee at strike@local4948.org
In Solidarity,
Maureen O’Reilly
President
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Bargaining Committee:
Brendan Haley, Viveca Gretton, Carmela DeGiorgio, Mary Bissell, Samee-Lee Grossman,
Brian Raymer and Karen Smith
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Executive Mobilization Team:
Steven Burdick, Nahid Rahnavard, Philip Singer and Fitzgerald Steele
When we met to exchange proposals, the Chief Negotiator for library management, Dan Keon, indicated very clearly that the Library Board wishes to be aligned with the City on all non-monetary and monetary issues. Three members of Mayor Ford’s Executive Committee sit on the Library Board, including Councillors Ainslie, Palacio, and Robinson. There are others on the Library Board, including Mike Foderick and Stephen Dulmage, who have indicated their support for a cost-cutting agenda for the Toronto Public Library that targets cuts to staff first and foremost.
The Mayor has given a mandate to the City’s negotiating committee to get concessions on wages, benefits and working conditions from CUPE Locals 416 and 79. On Jan.12 the City requested a “no-board” on Local 416, which will trigger a countdown to a possible lockout and disruption of services as early as February -- or the City could impose new terms and conditions of employment on 416 members.
On Jan. 10, library management indicated that the library board would be seeking the same concessions as the City on jobs, sick time, leaves, extended health and dental benefits and more as well as library specific concessions on hours of work, leaves, paid holidays, compensation and more. Management wants more discussions about how to achieve “efficiencies and improvements in library operations”. We know that “efficiencies” is code for more cuts to staff and loss of job opportunities.
Sweeping concessions would affect everyone
There is no hiding from the dire consequences of the amendments to your Collective Agreement tabled by management. Here are just some of the concessions they propose, and some of the stark implications for members:
Below is a list of some of the concessions that were tabled by the employer:
1. Jobs: Management wants to discuss all job security language in the collective agreement, in order to achieve greater “flexibility”. This means that management will be coming after our job security language and the provision that prohibits contracting out services if it will result in layoffs or loss of earnings. To date, the TPL Board has voted to cut 5.9 per cent, which represents a cut of 107 FTEs (full-time equivalents). If the City Budget Committee gets its way next week, the Board will be cutting 10 per cent and 161 FTEs. This on top of 198 FTEs cut since amalgamation!
Management also wants to discuss the increased use of volunteers. The Union supports the engagement of volunteers to complement the work of our members but not to replace our members work or reduce the number of jobs in our communities.
2. Cuts to benefits. Management wants to discuss “cost-savings” in extended health and dental benefits. The City proposes to cut benefits by 10 per cent.
3. Cuts to compensation including: Overtime, call-back pay, standby, Sunday work, evening & Saturday premiums. Here again, management wants to achieve “cost savings”. Management wants the ability to compel members to work on Sundays. Currently Sundays are voluntary.
4. Hours of work. Management is attacking Article 19 “Hours of Work” and looking to roll back all of the improvements that we have negotiated since amalgamation, including the elimination of variable work hours, the 63/7 option and TRL flex time.
At the same time, management wants to restrict page schedules and the right of pages to reschedule hours due to illness.
5. Management has tabled concessions on the collective agreement rights that provide time for our members to deal with family issues. 75 per cent of Local 4948 members are women. Many of our members struggle to maintain work/life balance. These provisions of our collective agreement assist our members with managing work schedules and responding to family concerns
We have set more dates for bargaining, but given these demands for concessions and what the City has done to Local 416 at the table, we are not optimistic that the TPL will bargain seriously. We next meet with the employer on Jan. 19.
Act now to safeguard your future
Your Local 4948 Strike Committee and Membership Mobilization teams are working hard to get information to the membership. The committee will be visiting the branches to answer questions and to share information.
Picket captains are being trained. If you haven’t signed up to be a picket captain and are willing, please let the strike committee know asap.
Every member should complete the picket duty sign-up form to register for picket duty. You can fax the form to the strike committee’s attention at 416-440-7984. If you need copies of the form, please contact your steward or the strike committee.
If you have questions about strike pay and benefits, please view the FAQ on the blog at http://www.libraryworkersunion.blogspot.com/.
If you have further questions, please contact the Strike Committee at strike@local4948.org
In Solidarity,
Maureen O’Reilly
President
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Bargaining Committee:
Brendan Haley, Viveca Gretton, Carmela DeGiorgio, Mary Bissell, Samee-Lee Grossman,
Brian Raymer and Karen Smith
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Executive Mobilization Team:
Steven Burdick, Nahid Rahnavard, Philip Singer and Fitzgerald Steele
Bargaining Bulletin No. 3
City Council Repudiates Ford Budget and
Deals Blow to Mayor’s Austerity Agenda for Toronto
Our campaign is working! City Council repudiated the Mayor’s budget agenda Jan. 17, by supporting the motion by Councillor Josh Colle to restore $15 million in cuts by using part of the 2012 surplus. Cuts to TTC routes, community pools, daycares, shelters and more were saved.
…but Libraries still face cuts
A separate amendment moved by Councillor Raymond Cho reversed a further $3.9 million in cuts to the library budget that was approved by Ford’s Executive Committee last week.
Thanks to Councillors Vaughan, Carroll, Doucette, Davis, Tam-Wong, McConnell, Lindsay Luby, Colle, Matlow, McMahon, Bailao, Lee, Mihevc, Layton, Fragedakis, Augimeri, Filion, Fletcher, De Baeremaeker, Perks and Perruzza who all supported the Cho motion.
Credit our campaign for this victory! Together with library users, we fought off cuts to library branches and hours, saving 61 jobs in the process. We also fought off further cuts to programming and outreach and to the collections budget.
The total cut to the 2012 TPL budget is still 5.9 per cent, or $10 million. This means we are still facing a cut of 107 full-time equivalent positions. These cuts will affect our services.
All told, there has been a 17-per cent cut in library staffing since amalgamation, resulting in longer wait times, more technology replacing human interaction and assistance for our library patrons, and heavier workloads for staff.
“Outing” the City’s Hidden Agenda
Only last fall, Mayor Ford was talking about a $774-million budget shortfall, but when the real number surfaced, it turned into a $154 million surplus — a switch of almost $1 billion over three months!
Last week, the City flatly rejected CUPE Local 416’s offer of a three-year wage freeze, in return for reduced cuts to City services and status-quo on collective agreement rights. It was a telling moment in this round of bargaining: It’s not about the money, after all.
Local 416’s offer blew away the last of the smoke that hovers over the Mayor’s so-called budget “crisis” and revealed his real hidden agenda: An attack on job security provisions to pave the way for more widespread cuts and contracting out to private companies.
Mayor Ford’s supporters on City Council don’t like to be too specific on what service is next on the block. They fear it will provoke a fire-storm of public reaction, just as it has with the proposed cuts to libraries. Not that it will stop them -- so long as they have the votes on Council -- but it may slow them down a bit.
That’s why they repeat the so-called “jobs for life” line to describe the job security provisions in our collective agreement. It’s a mantra that seems to work well with the public -- at least until people think about it.
No work means no job
The truth is, no one’s job is ever totally safe, and library employees are no different. If there’s no work, there’s no job -- it’s that simple.
Our Collective Agreement provides assurance that employees who do their jobs won't be subject to arbitrary actions by the employer. And it offers a redeployment process that requires management to honour our seniority, our wages through the process, and our dignity.
Job security is a basic tenet of unionization – it’s the big reason why people join unions. In fact, our contract language is similar to that of most other union contracts across Canada. Negotiated between union and management over many rounds of bargaining, job security clauses express our mutual loyalty to the library system and reward our years of service.
This benefits the TPL and the residents who rely on libraries, just as much as it does those who work in them. The public doesn’t want libraries staffed by a revolving-door of low-wage workers. The TPL is not McDonalds.
Countdown for Local 416
Most of the media focus is now on Local 416 (City outside workers) negotiations, which started bargaining before the other CUPE locals. The City has asked for a “no board” report on Local 416 bargaining, which will soon start a countdown to a possible lockout deadline in early February.
Bargaining has only just begun for Local 4948, with dates set into February. Local 79 (inside workers) has bargaining dates to the end of the month; bargaining has yet to start for Local 2998, representing the association of community centres.
Toronto Together:
Solidarity Will Let Us Defeat Ford’s Labour Disruption Agenda Too
The four CUPE locals have been working closely together along with CUPE National to mount a united front against the mayor’s labour disruption agenda. CUPE National released an Environics poll showing majority public support for maintaining City services. CUPE will also launch a new series of television ads Jan. 19, highlighting some of the important work we do and calling for fair contract negotiations. See the ad at torontotogether.ca and watch for more
In solidarity,
Maureen O’Reilly
President
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Bargaining Committee:
Brendan Haley, Viveca Gretton, Carmela DeGiorgio, Mary Bissell, Samee-Lee Grossman,
Brian Raymer and Karen Smith
On behalf of your TPLWU Local 4948 Executive Mobilization Team:
January 18, 2012
Great Video on Public Service Workers!
Check this video out - and spot the library worker!
Please like this video and share. This is a great message about the people who actually deliver the services Torontonians value!
January 17, 2012
Further Cuts to Public Library Voted Down by City Council
Ford and his shrinking number of supporters failed to ram through a City budget full of cuts to services and programs. Finally, the Ford administration was forced to listen to the people of Toronto who have consistently opposed these cuts aimed at the City's most vulnerable.
Library Board member Cllr Janet Davis presented over 55,000 petitions to save the library against further cuts. Cllr Davis, along with Board member Cllr Sarah Doucette, have been staunch public library defenders.
Cllr Raymond Cho put forward a motion to prevent further cuts to the public library beyond the 5.9% cuts offered up by the City Librarian. Cllr Cho's motion passed to huge cheers and applause from the crowd.
Shockingly, Library Board Chair, Cllr Paul Ainslie and Library Board members Cllr Jaye Robinson and Cllr Cesar Palacio voted AGAINST Cllr Cho's motion to prevent further cuts to the library.
Read David Rider's article in the Toronto Star here. Read Royson James here
and National Post's Natalie Alcoba here, and Patrick White and Elizabeth Church in the Globe here.
For the record: see if your local councillor voted "yes" to protecting our public library.
Library Board member Cllr Janet Davis presented over 55,000 petitions to save the library against further cuts. Cllr Davis, along with Board member Cllr Sarah Doucette, have been staunch public library defenders.
Cllr Raymond Cho put forward a motion to prevent further cuts to the public library beyond the 5.9% cuts offered up by the City Librarian. Cllr Cho's motion passed to huge cheers and applause from the crowd.
Shockingly, Library Board Chair, Cllr Paul Ainslie and Library Board members Cllr Jaye Robinson and Cllr Cesar Palacio voted AGAINST Cllr Cho's motion to prevent further cuts to the library.
Read David Rider's article in the Toronto Star here. Read Royson James here
and National Post's Natalie Alcoba here, and Patrick White and Elizabeth Church in the Globe here.
For the record: see if your local councillor voted "yes" to protecting our public library.
January 13, 2012
Open Letter From Toronto Authors to Protect Our Public Library
Toronto's top writers urge City Hall to reject Public Library cuts
TORONTO, Jan. 13, 2012 /CNW/ - More than 120 of Toronto's best known literary figures have signed an open letter to Mayor Rob Ford and City Council to express their concern that proposed cuts to the Toronto Public Library will do grievous harm to one of the leading public libraries in the world and the people who use it.
The letter is posted on the website www.OurPublicLibrary.to, launched last summer as a protest against Ford administration-planned library cuts. Within four weeks of its launch, over 50,000 Torontonians signed the petition on the site, which briefly crashed when Canada's most celebrated author, Margaret Atwood retweeted a post about the petition to her more than a quarter million Twitter followers.
In their letter, the authors point out that in the absence of any proper evaluation of the real costs of cutting our public library, City Council has no business even considering budget reductions and should use a small fraction of the City's 2011 budget surplus to avoid potentially costly blind decisions.
The open letter to Mayor Ford and City Council has been signed by dozens of internationally recognized and award winning novelists, story tellers, and literary figures including Atwood, Scotiabank Giller Award winner Vincent Lam, Linwood Barclay, Susan Swan and Giller Prize founder Jack Rabinovitch.
"Torontonians love and need their library and do not wish to see it diminished, and this is yet another sign of that affection and demonstration of the importance of our public library," said Maureen O'Reilly, President of the Toronto Public Library Workers Union.
The text of the letter follows:
Dear Mayor Ford and City Councillors:
We are concerned that cuts to the Toronto Public Library will do grievous harm to one of the leading public libraries in the world and the people who use it. Please do not support budget proposals that would limit access to our public library or diminish it in any way.
The Toronto Public Library is so important for so many reasons that we are surprised and alarmed to know that there has been no evaluation of the potential costs of gutting library services and programs.
Will the cost of education rise as a result of the cuts? How about the cost of settling newcomers? Or the economic cost to the city's reputation? Apparently, we just don't know because no one has produced a credible case that library cuts will actually save money.
With an expected 2011 surplus of more than $150 million, it is not necessary to make these cuts blindly.
Proposed library budget cuts represent only a small portion of the City's available surplus. We have the resources to maintain current library services throughout 2012 while we conduct a comprehensive, business-like study of the economic value of Toronto's library system to the city as a whole. The result will be that in the next budget cycle we can determine with confidence what, if any, cuts to library services make sense.
We urge you to support this rational approach to determining the future of one of the world's great library systems rather than supporting the current proposals that would blindly hack away at this cherished institution.
Yours sincerely,
The letter is posted on the website www.OurPublicLibrary.to, launched last summer as a protest against Ford administration-planned library cuts. Within four weeks of its launch, over 50,000 Torontonians signed the petition on the site, which briefly crashed when Canada's most celebrated author, Margaret Atwood retweeted a post about the petition to her more than a quarter million Twitter followers.
In their letter, the authors point out that in the absence of any proper evaluation of the real costs of cutting our public library, City Council has no business even considering budget reductions and should use a small fraction of the City's 2011 budget surplus to avoid potentially costly blind decisions.
The open letter to Mayor Ford and City Council has been signed by dozens of internationally recognized and award winning novelists, story tellers, and literary figures including Atwood, Scotiabank Giller Award winner Vincent Lam, Linwood Barclay, Susan Swan and Giller Prize founder Jack Rabinovitch.
"Torontonians love and need their library and do not wish to see it diminished, and this is yet another sign of that affection and demonstration of the importance of our public library," said Maureen O'Reilly, President of the Toronto Public Library Workers Union.
The text of the letter follows:
Dear Mayor Ford and City Councillors:
We are concerned that cuts to the Toronto Public Library will do grievous harm to one of the leading public libraries in the world and the people who use it. Please do not support budget proposals that would limit access to our public library or diminish it in any way.
The Toronto Public Library is so important for so many reasons that we are surprised and alarmed to know that there has been no evaluation of the potential costs of gutting library services and programs.
Will the cost of education rise as a result of the cuts? How about the cost of settling newcomers? Or the economic cost to the city's reputation? Apparently, we just don't know because no one has produced a credible case that library cuts will actually save money.
With an expected 2011 surplus of more than $150 million, it is not necessary to make these cuts blindly.
Proposed library budget cuts represent only a small portion of the City's available surplus. We have the resources to maintain current library services throughout 2012 while we conduct a comprehensive, business-like study of the economic value of Toronto's library system to the city as a whole. The result will be that in the next budget cycle we can determine with confidence what, if any, cuts to library services make sense.
We urge you to support this rational approach to determining the future of one of the world's great library systems rather than supporting the current proposals that would blindly hack away at this cherished institution.
Yours sincerely,
| Elizabeth Abbott Margaret Atwood Linwood Barclay Michael Barnes Bob Barton Matt Beam John Bemrose Gail Benick Jody Berland Samantha Bernstein David Bezmozgis Ann Birch Heather Birrell Lorne Blumer Gail Bowen Allan Briesmaster David Brown Pat Brown Cathy Marie Buchanan Kathy Buckworth Mary Byers Barry Callaghan Veronika Martenova Charles David Clark Tish Cohen Charis Cotter Pauline Couture Cheryl Cowdy Susan Crean Tom Crothers Brian Day Sandra Dempsey Kristen den Hartog Claudia Dey Sonia Di Placido Tom Douglas Dan Dowhal Glen Downie Bernadette Dyer David Dyment Soraya Erian | Terri Favro Joy Fielding Judy Fong Bates Sylvia Fraser Keith Garebian Gale Zoe Garnett Graeme Gibson David Gilmour Susan Glickman Katherine Govier Sonja Greckol Bob Hanke Amy Lavender Harris Maggie Helwig Cynthia Holz Maureen Hynes John Jeneroux Jan Kainer Alexey Konkin Bianca Lakoseljac Vincent Lam Jennifer Lanthier Shari Lapena Myrna Levy Joan Levy Earle Lesley Livingston Rona Maynard Seymour Mayne Dennis McCloskey Ken McGoogan Sharon E. McKay Maria Meindl Ruth Miller Fereshteh Molavi Anne Montagnes Esteve Morera Colleen Murphy Mahtab Narsimhan Zoe Newman Hal Niedzviecki Liam O'Donnell | Susan Ouriou Karen Patkau Shelley Peterson Anna Porter Kate Pullinger Jack Rabinovitch Ceta Ramkhalawansingh Ray Robertson Gilbert Reid Heidi Reimer Peter Robinson Bev Katz Rosenbaum Robert Rotenberg Jeffrey Round Zoë S. Roy Ron Ruakin John Scully Emil Sher Philip Siller Sharon Singer Emily St. John Mandel Linda Stitt Patricia Storms David Stren Cordelia Strube Johanna Stuckey Susan Swan Jeremy Tankard Paul Vermeersch Thom Vernon Stephen Voyce Susana Wald Natalie Zina Walschots Sylvia Warsh Pam Watts Robert Paul Weston Erika Whitney Sheila Wilmot Mary Wood Paul Zemokhol Rachel Zolf Eric Zweig |
Bargaining News from Workers at The Toronto Civic Employeees Union Local 416
Read the latest regarding the Toronto Civic Employees Union Local 416 here.
Local 416 in the news:
David Rider in the Toronto Star
Patrick White in the Globe
Natalie Alcoba in the National Post
January 10, 2012
Do You Have Questions About Picket Duty Sign-Up Forms?
To all Local 4948 Library Workers
Thanks to all those who have already signed up for picket duty - keep those forms coming in!
A reminder: for all questions related to picket duty and related issues, please contact:
strike@local4948.org not the general info email.
Stay tuned for the next FAQ to answer your questions.
Thanks to all those who have already signed up for picket duty - keep those forms coming in!
A reminder: for all questions related to picket duty and related issues, please contact:
strike@local4948.org not the general info email.
Stay tuned for the next FAQ to answer your questions.
Membership Log-In
Please note that the "Members Only" log-in on the new Local 4948 website is not yet activated.
We are expecting to have this activated shortly - stay tuned - we will announce when the members' log-in is up and running.
We are expecting to have this activated shortly - stay tuned - we will announce when the members' log-in is up and running.
January 06, 2012
Important Information to All Members re: Lockout / Strike
To All Local 4948 Library Workers:
Local 4948 will be bargaining in early January.
The City of Toronto has filed for conciliation with Local 416 and Local 79 and the threat of a lockout / strike is very real at the City, as the City has tabled concessions on job security, benefits and working conditions and has been preparing to hire replacement workers.
Local 4948 will be continuing to send out information to the membership as bargaining unfolds.
Your strike committee is in place and has met with the Executive Board to prepare a strike / lockout plan.
In the event of a lockout / strike, members will be picketing to receive strike pay and benefits.
Please see the FAQ below for information about strike pay eligilibity and other answers to common questions.
Please register for strike pay and picket duty by signing the Labour Dispute – Picket Sign-Up form.
*Mobile Picket Line: members sign up to participate in the Mobile Picket Line may be dispatched to roving picket lines and other creative action including, for example, an information picket or a creative action to build public support etc.
*Picket Captains: are the organizers on a picket line and will be repsonsible for safety, leading pickets, and dealing with any issues as they arise. Picket captain training will take place in January.
When can the employer lockout unionized employees and when can a union strike?
It has been reported in the media that there will be layoffs as a result of the cuts to staffing. Will there be layoffs? Which positions are being deleted?
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a lockout?
A lockout is when the employer decides to bar unionized employees from working. During a lockout, unionized employees are prevented from working and do not receive pay.
What is a strike?
A strike is a work stoppage caused by the refusal of employees to go to work in support of a bargaining position or to protest some aspect of the employer’s proposed terms and conditions of employment.
When can the employer lockout unionized employees and when can a union strike?
During bargaining, once notice to bargain has been served by either party, either party may file for conciliation. Conciliation is a step in bargaining where a conciliation officer is appointed by the Ministry of Labour to assist the parties in avoiding a strike or lockout. During conciliation, either party may request what is called a “no-board report”. Once a no-board report has been issued, the parties are in a legal lockout or strike position at 12:01am on the 17th calendar day from the date the no-board was issued. On the 17th day, the employer is in a legal position to lockout unionized employees and the union is in a legal position to call a strike.
Once we are in a legal strike or lockout position, are we automatically locked out or on strike?
A lockout or strike is not automatic. There is no strike or lockout unless the employer advises the union it is locking out the unionized employees or the union, i.e. the bargaining committee, advises the employer that the union is striking.
Will there be a strike or lockout?
The Union does not want to strike. We want to make every effort to reach a negotiated settlement. Only the employer will know if there will be a lockout.
Is the employer legally allowed to alter wages or working conditions?
Under Section 86 of the Ontario Labour Relations Board, where notice to bargain has been given, the employer is not legally permitted to alter wages or working conditions, until such time as a no-board has been issued and the parties are in a legal lockout/strike position. The period in which wages and working conditions cannot be altered is often referred to as a “statutory freeze”. Once either party has requested a “no-board” and the parties are in a legal lockout/strike position on the 17th calendar day from the date the no-board was issued, the employer can legally alter wages or working conditions.
If there is a strike/lockout, who is eligible for strike pay?
You are eligible for strike pay during a lockout or a strike if:
a) You are a member of Local 4948 in good standing (paying dues) and;
b) You have completed a Strike Pay Application form (forms will be provided and circulated to all members) and;
c) Are on the active payroll of the Toronto Public Library at the beginning of the strike/lockout and;
d) Participate in the strike/lockout by performing assigned strike duties for at least 20 hours per calendar week.
Members who are eligible for benefits shall receive strike pay beginning on the 10th calendar day of the strike.
Members who do not participate by performing strike duties without just cause are not eligible for strike benefits.
Who is not eligible for strike benefits?
a) Any member not meeting the eligibility criteria outlined above.
b) Any member failing to perform strike duties without just cause.
c) If at the beginning of the lockout/strike, the member was receiving sickness, accident and/or WSIB benefits.
Do I receive strike benefits for the first 10 days of a lockout strike?
You will receive strike benefits beginning on the 10th day of the lockout/strike if you have participated by performing at least 20 hours of assigned strike duties per calendar week in the first 10 days.
What are strike benefits?
The CUPE Strike Fund covers strike benefits, including strike pay for picket duty and health benefits, in the event of a lockout/strike. Strike pay is $40/day to a maximum of $200 for at least 20 hours of picketing or other assigned duties per calendar week.
How many hours a day will I need to picket?
The strike committee will determine the picketing shifts and locations and will assign strike duties to all members. To be eligible for strike pay, you need to have completed 20 hours of picketing per calendar week. Members are encouraged to picket a minimum of 20 hours per calendar week.
Each picketer will be assigned a picket captain who will answer questions about where and when you will picket.
It is important that you sign the Strike Pay Application form to register for strike benefits. When you are picketing it will be important that you sign in and out at the beginning and end of your shift.
I’m a part-time employee and work only 10 hours per week. Do I have to picket 20 hours a week to be eligible for strike pay?
In order to be eligible for strike pay, you need to have completed 20 hours of picketing in a calendar week. Once you are eligible for strike pay, you can picket for 10 hours/week and receive $100 if that is the maximum amount of time you are able to commit to. All members, regardless of part-time or full-time status, are encouraged to picket for a minimum of 20 hours a week.
What if I have scheduled pre-approved vacation during the strike?
If you have scheduled pre-approved vacation, the employer is obligated to pay employees the vacation pay that would have been paid to them with respect to that vacation. However members should be aware that to be eligible for strike pay, they will need to have performed assigned strike duties for at least 20 hours per calendar week. For example: the lockout/strike begins on Feb. 1st and a member is on vacation until Feb. 5th. Until that member has completed 20 hours per calendar week of strike duties, he/she will not be eligible for strike pay.
During a lockout or strike, it is important that all members participate and demonstrate their union solidarity, by completing assigned strike duties. The shorter the picket line, the longer the strike.
What if I am on maternity/paternity leave? Will I continue receiving the top-up from the employer?
Employment Insurance (EI) maternity/parental leave benefits would continue during a lockout or a strike if the member was on leave prior to the lockout. Unless the parties agree otherwise in a strike protocol, maternity and parental leave top-up under Article 28 of the Collective Agreement is not likely to be paid during a strike or lockout.
What happens if I’m on Long-Term Disability?
LTD is normally continued as it is delivered by a third party benefits carrier.
What about if I’m on short-term disability or IIP?
The accumulated sick bank plan and Illness or Injury Plan is a contractual benefit. It is likely that these benefits would not be continued in the event of a lockout or a strike. Normally this would be one of the issues that the union and the employer would discuss and agree upon in a strike protocol.
What if I’m on WSIB benefits?
If the member is on WSIB benefits prior to the strike/lockout, benefits would continue.
What about my extended health and dental benefits?
The CUPE Strike Fund will pay the group life and group extended health premiums for the members who are eligible for strike pay for the whole period of the lockout/strike. If the employer refuses to pay its share of the premiums during a lockout/strike, the CUPE Strike Fund will pay the full premiums.
The other possibility is that CUPE might reimburse members for benefit costs during the strike/lockout.
During a lockout/strike, is the employer still obligated to issue T4’s?
Yes, the employer is still obligated to issue T4’s.
At the end of a lockout/strike, do I have the option to buy-back my OMERS pension?
You can purchase any leave of absence authorized by the employer, including a legal lockout or strike. You would pay the total contributions that you and the employer would have paid during the period of absence.
It has been reported in the media that there will be layoffs as a result of the cuts to staffing. Will there be layoffs? Which positions are being deleted?
On October 17, 2011, the Toronto Public Library Board voted to cut 100 FTEs. On December 12, 2011, the Board voted to cut another 7 FTEs. City Council will vote in January on the total budget for the library. There is no doubt that these cuts signify a massive reduction in the staff. These cuts are on top of the 198 FTEs that were cut since amalgamation.
We have a “no lay-off” provision in our collective agreement. This provision prohibits permanent and part-time members from being laid off for the duration of the collective agreement.
The City Librarian has assured staff that the cuts to FTEs will occur through attrition. But there are not sufficient vacancies and it is unclear exactly how the cuts to staff will be achieved. Management has provided notice to the Union of the library’s intention to redeploy staff under Article 18 of the Collective Agreement but at this point the Union has not been given specific information about what positions will cut and where. More information will be provided once it is made available to the Union.
We should all be concerned about protecting jobs at the library for the current generation and for future generations. The library is already understaffed before any further cuts to jobs are made.
I don’t want to go on strike or be locked out. How can we avoid a strike or lockout?
The best way to avoid a strike or a lockout is to actively participate in the union’s campaign to defend public library services and jobs. There are lots of ways to get involved. Encourage neighbours, family and friends to sign the petition at ourpubliclibrary.to. Encourage people to write to their City Councillors to urge them not to cut library services (including branches, hours, staff, collections, etc) and not to cut unionized jobs. Attend the numerous events being organized in the City against the cuts to public services. Attend general membership meetings, Toronto Public Library Board meetings, Toronto Labour Council events and more. For more information, contact your steward or Unit Chair.
How can I prepare for a possible lockout/strike?
1. Ensure that the Union has your personal email address and phone number so that you can be reached when you are not at work.
2. You may want to inform your financial institution to make alternate arrangements should you be relying on strike pay. For example you may want to request in advance, to defer payments.
3. During a lockout/strike, you would not have access to the workplace. You should remove all of your personal belongings in advance.
4. You are advised to discuss your financial situation with your bank or credit union well in advance of a lockout/strike and not to wait to secure a line of credit, for example. It is important to secure a line of credit while you are working.
5. In the event of a lockout/strike, it is advisable to let creditors and landlords know right away that you need to make a special arrangement in order to protect your credit rating. It is better to try to make a special arrangement then to miss payments.
6. Contact the Fort York Credit Union for more information if you are a member or wish to join. Their number is 416-530-6474 or fyinfo@fortyork.com
Download pdf version of FAQ #1 here.
January 01, 2012
A Look Back at 2011 . . .
The New Year is a traditional time to recall the most significant people and events of the past 12 months. At no time in its long history has the Toronto Public Library been more in the news than in 2011 so there is a lot of recounting to do. Here is TPLWU's list of those who advocated on behalf of the TPL and recognized and respected her as the busiest urban public library system in the world and those who attacked her and left her a little worse for wear.
Cups up for:
Councillors Sarah Doucette and Janet Davis. Both sit on the Toronto Public Library Board and have consistently been strong supporters of the library service and advocates for the staff.
The tens of thousands of Torontonians who signed our petition, wrote their City Councillor, deputed on our behalf, and have shown their tremendous support and love of the library service.
Canadian Writers, including the 11 Toronto-based authors who participated in our "My Library Matters to Me Contest" as prizes and the many, many more in the literary community who have shown their support for our campaign. And let's not forget the more than 500 participants in the contest, whose submissions are a treasure trove of reasons why libraries matter. It was tough to pick the 50+ winners!Minister of Culture Michael Chan, who responded swiftly to a Toronto councillor’s request to charge for the circulation of library materials and declared that the Public Libraries Act would not be opened up.
Councillor Raymond Cho – one of the first fiscal conservatives on Council who broke with the Fords and who gave a heartfelt deputation at the TPLB in September on the importance of libraries to our communitiesCups down for:
City Librarian Jane Pyper, who claimed that the elimination of 100 library workers would not have any effect on service delivery, and under whose leadership the TPL has suffered the largest cuts in its history.
City Budget Chief Mike Del Grande, who maintained that the library does not need to purchase materials in languages other than English, despite Toronto's status as the world's most multicultural city, and who is insisting that an arbitrary 10% budget cut be forced upon the library service over the wishes of the Board.
TPLB Chair Paul Ainslie and Vice-Chair Mike Foderick, who moved a motion to eliminate over 18,000 open hours from the library system. When challenged that this would place Toronto below the average provincial open hours for library service, Ainslie replied that perhaps all libraries in Ontario were open too much.
The Ford Brothers, whose cost-cutting mania has put the city at risk and who seem to have a particular dislike for the li-berry service.
Paul Christie, former Toronto District School Board budget slasher under the Mike Harris regime and now a lobbyist for LSSI, a U.S. firm that works to privatize library systems around the world. December 28, 2011
From the Edmonton Chapter of the Progressive Librarians Guild
The Edmonton Chapter of the Progressive Librarians Guild:
Position Statement on the Threat of Branch Closures and/or Privatization to Toronto Public Libraries
The Edmonton Chapter of the Progressive Librarians Guild strongly condemns the plans of Toronto City Council to potentially reduce the services of Toronto Public Library by either closing branches and/or privatizing any part of this fundamental public institution.
Public libraries are more than the collections they house: they are vital community spaces that provide free and equitable access to information; they provide a space where people can connect with each other and their neighbourhoods.[1]
Mayor Ford has stated that he is a “believer in building better communities through community action”;[2] he is passionate about “promoting the positive development of youth.”[3] Mayor Ford’s attempt to close branches, reduce services, or privatize the Toronto Public Library is an egregious move for many reasons, not excluding the significant role public libraries play in community action and the positive development of youth. This move is a direct contradiction of Ford’s stated commitment to communities and to youth in particular. Closing library branches and reducing services will result in the removal of access to free information services for Torontonians.
The City of Toronto must reduce its costs to avoid a $774 million budget shortage next year.[4] However, cutting funding to the Toronto Public Library could prevent the city from balancing its budget. Research has proven that for every tax dollar spent on public library services, the community receives close to a five dollar return on investment.[5] As a result, cuts to the city’s public library system could also decrease tax revenue for the city and make it more difficult for the city to balance its budget.
While the City of Toronto considers cutting its public library’s budget, other city councils across the country are increasing funding to support their public libraries. In 2010, the Edmonton Public Library received $32,587,513.00 in operating grants from all levels of government; the City of Edmonton provided $28,208,000 of that total amount.[6] The Edmonton Public Library also has plans to build new libraries and renovate existing branches with anticipated completion dates ranging between 2012 and 2014.[7] Furthermore, the Edmonton Public Library has hired 19 Community Librarians to enhance library services to Edmontonians.[8] Edmonton City Council recognizes the importance of public library service for Edmontonians and funds this essential service accordingly.
The threat to reduce services and/or privatize the Toronto Public Library is alarming on its own; when we look at this threat to TPL on a broader scale, the trend of privatizing essential public services in North America makes this threat even greater. Public services in Canada are under attack: there are attempts to create a two-tiered health care system[9], there have been recent teacher layoffs in public education[10], and the recent lock out of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers by Canada Post are only a few examples. Privatizing the public library system of Canada’s largest city would set a disturbing precedent.
The threat to privatization is indicative of a lack of understanding and respect not only to the Toronto Public Library and the free information and recreation services provided by it, but also for public service workers and public institutions everywhere. The Edmonton Chapter of the Progressive Librarians Guild beseeches Toronto City Council to keep all 99 branches of the Toronto Public Library open and to support and celebrate the services provided by library workers to their communities.
Keep all Toronto Public Library branches open. Keep them public.
[1] Toronto Public Library: http://www.torontopubliclibrary.ca/about-the-library/mission-vision-values/. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
[2] City of Toronto: http://www.toronto.ca/mayor_ford/index.htm. Retrieved July 30, 2011.
[3] Ibid.
[4] City of Toronto: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewPublishedReport.do?function=getAgendaReport&meetingId=5052. Retrieved August 4, 2011.
[5] CUPE: Nova Scotia Provincial Library: https://www.library.ns.ca/content/use-public-libraries-hard-economic-times. Retrieved August 4, 2001.
[6] A New Day at EPL: 2010 Annual Report, p.22: http://www.epl.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/annual-reports/eplannual2010.pdf. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
[7] Edmonton Public Library: http://www.epl.ca/about-epl/building_projects. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
[8] A New Day at EPL: 2010 Annual Report, p.8: http://www.epl.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/annual-reports/eplannual2010.pdf. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
[9] CBC News: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/story/2010/02/18/calgary-health-let-the-rich-pay-economist.html?ref=rss. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
[10] CBC News: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/01/19/bc-vancouver-teachers-layoffs.html. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
Edmonton Journal: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/business/Teacher+layoffs+coming/4835476/story.html. Retrieved August 5, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Introducing......Our New Union Logo!
Many thanks to Local 4948 member, Alex Berry, for designing our first Toronto Public Library Workers' Union Local 4948 logo.





